Sheik: Moderate U.S. Muslims have become 'the silent majority' - 10/11/01

Search detnews.com
GO
Space.com

Thursday, October 11, 2001



Site Index
Homepage
Search
CyberSurveys
Ask the Expert
News Talk
Sports Talk
Lions Talk
Tiger Talk
Wings Talk
Car Talk
Tech Talk
Horoscope
Hot Sites
Lottery
Weather
Staff

News
Autos
Joyrides
Business
Careers
Census
Columnists
Commuting
Detroit History
Editorials
Health
Metro / State
Livingston
Macomb
Oakland
Wayne
On Detroit
Nation / World
Obituaries
Death Notices
Politics / Govt.
Real Estate
Religion
Schools
Special Reports
Technology

Sports
Sports Home
Lions/NFL
Pistons/NBA
Red Wings/NHL
Shock/WNBA
Tigers/Baseball
MSU
U-M
More Colleges
Golf Guide
High Schools
Motor Sports
Outdoors
More Sports
Scoreboards

Entertainment
Entertainment
Casino Guide
Movie Finder
TV Listings
Crossword

Homestyle
Homestyle home
Decorating
Food
Gardening
Home Improvement
Home Life
Home Tech
Wine Report

Photo Galleries
Sports
Red Wings
Lions
Autos
Joyrides
News
History

Copyright 2001
The Detroit News.

Use of this site indicates your agreement to the Terms of Service (updated 08/09/2001).


Sheik: Moderate U.S. Muslims have become 'the silent majority'


By Diane Katz / The Detroit News

Image
Diane Katz / The Detroit News

Sheik Muhammad Hisham Kabbani says the message of moderate American Muslims is being drowned out by other Muslim groups.
Comment on this story
Send this story to a friend
Get Home Delivery
   In a speech to the U.S. State Department more than two years ago, Sheik Muhammad Hisham Kabbani warned that Islamic extremists posed a security threat to America. Six of the leading Arab-American groups denounced him at the time. Since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, Sheik Kabbani, who heads the Fenton-based Islamic Supreme Council of America, has urged American Muslims to stand firm against Islamic extremism. The following are edited excerpts from an interview with Detroit News editorial writer Diane Katz:
   Q. Where were you on Sept. 11 when you heard about the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, D.C., and what was your reaction?
   A. I was at home. My wife woke me and told me to come quickly because one of our members who works on Wall Street was on the phone. She was hysterical. I tried to calm her down. At the same time, my wife turned on the TV, and we saw the other plane hit (the World Trade Center). Immediately, I prayed to God that this attack would be minimized in its casualties.
   Q. Did you immediately suspect these were acts of terrorism?
   A. I didn't think it was an accident -- especially when the second plane hit. And especially when there had been reports 10 days before the attack ... all over the Middle East that they were going to hit hard on American soil and on the banks and the U.S. economy.
   Q. You warned in a speech to the State Department in January 1999 that extremism posed a threat to U.S. national security. You were excoriated by other Arab-American groups for saying that.
   A. As someone who has visited lots of countries and seen many wars in the Middle East, and coming from a very well-known family in Lebanon with a lot of roots in politics and religious affairs, I can know from sources around the world when there is something being prepared. And when we hear speeches antagonistic to America, you can put all these together. Moderate Muslims and peace-loving Muslims felt we had to say something. But there is a minority that is not like that. And we don't have the microphone as they have.
   Q. Why do they have the microphone and you don't?
   A. Peaceful Muslims, moderate Muslims, do not interfere in the politics or foreign policy of the United States. We want to pray. We are not interested in speeches. But the activists are very clever. They use the mosques and Islamic centers to gain credibility for themselves. And that's where it begins to create a problem.
   Q. So the pulpits are being hijacked for political purposes?
   A. Yes, that is correct. They are using the name of Islam for their own benefit and interest. But it is not in the principles of Islam to attack and terrorize people. Prophet Mohammed never declared war against anyone. The way (activists) present things is dangerous. It is not the real Islamic way. It is a mistake to mix our religious teachings, our freedom of religion, with politics or foreign policy.
   Q. Is this part of a plan to establish a U.S. network for political groups overseas?
   A. I don't know that. I know they are strong. They have a huge network, and they work together. These opposition groups didn't find a space in their own countries because Middle East governments didn't allow them. So many of their leaders ran away and began to establish themselves around the world. And some of them came to the United States to establish this radical ideology. And they have grown because they have money, and they begin to take over. Many of our moderate people become the silent majority.
   Q. President Bush has had people to the White House whose organizational ties would be a significant concern to most Americans.
   A. I was surprised, when I was invited to the National Cathedral for the national day of prayer, and saw many of them there who had condemned me. Those people ... who says they speak on behalf of Muslims? There are a lot of Muslims who don't like them. They don't want them. But they have the microphone. In front of the cameras, they say the United States is good. Then they rally against the United States, they demonstrate against the United States, they say the wrath of God is coming against the United States.
   Q. Has the reaction from Muslim groups to the terrorist attacks been adequate?
   A. No, because they haven't stated names. They have tried to keep running around the bushes, saying, "Show us proof of who did this." But it is the responsibility of the Muslim community as a whole to stand up and to condemn by name the terrorists and specify what these organizations are and dissociate themselves from them. I said it to the State Department two years ago. I mentioned who is good and who is not good. Who is being a terrorist and who is not. And that has to be asked of them today. Either they come out now or they will be accused in the future of being sympathizers of organizations that have been classified as terrorist. They have to be careful because they represent some Muslims, and the lives of the Muslims they represent might be jeopardized because they have stopped short of condemning these terrorist organizations.
   Q. Was the United States naive to think it was immune from terrorism?
   A. The United States is not naive. When it wants to know, it knows. But it might be that Congress never got this information.
   Q. Have there been mistakes in foreign policy that have created an environment for terrorism?
   A. I don't like to interfere in politics or foreign policy. But in every country, there are mistakes in foreign policy. President Bush has to know who he can really trust, and he has to build a coalition with the Arab and Muslim world to solve the problem of terrorism. I'm sad because when I spoke up in 1999, they didn't listen. And to the extent that the extremists are everywhere -- in the administration, on Capitol Hill -- they didn't do their homework.
   Q. Has the United States been lax on immigration?
   A. The Immigration and Naturalization Service has been lax on everything. It didn't do the job correctly because it felt that America is the best country, a just country, and it didn't expect such payback.
   Q. What is the biggest misconception about Islam?
   A. Whenever there is problem in the Middle East, whatever crisis, it is always Muslim countries or Arab countries fighting. So Americans got the wrong picture of Islam. The moderate Muslim community has tried to work this out, but the interference of the others who are hijacking the microphone and becoming stronger is creating a problem. They are always criticizing and complaining. The real message of Islam is submission, surrender to the Lord's will, and goodness to one's neighbors. Islam is a message of peace.